declaration: site displays ads - they may appear on any page as text and banners. as an amazon associate I may earn from qualifying purchases. more info

Kodak & the invention of digital photography

creativeref:1011l90752

#ad #affiliatelinks #earncommission - as an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases - more info

Steve Sasson, unsung hero...

Updated: Nov 10, 2020

V1.2 - 10.07.2021

In previous posts I may have mentioned that I've been doing this for quite a while.

My career has spanned over the 30 years that saw the rise of the digital revolution and the demise of the once great yellow company. It's a company and a subject that interests me and I have a few articles that I'd like to share.

This post is a celebration of how far digital photography has come, and the contribution of a Kodak researcher called Steven Sasson, the inventor of the hand held digital camera.

I wanted to show you, with a practical demonstration of images, just how far digital photography has come since 1975.

Steve Sasson at Kodak in 1973. Credit: Steve Sasson

Steven Sasson in 1973, the year he started working at Eastman Kodak. Credit: Steven Sasson

Regarding the claim that Steven invented the digital camera Wikipedia says:

“Steven Sasson invented the first self-contained digital camera at Eastman Kodak in 1975…
… His was not the first camera that produced digital images, but was the first hand-held digital camera”.

Wikipedia

Well, OK Then... Let's take a look:

First-Digital-Camera-Steve-Sasson-Kodak

Kodak's first "hand Held" Digital Camera

I want one of those!

People of a certain age will see the cassette tape on the side. This gives us an idea of scale.

Now, my first reaction was to give a broad smile and a giggle, but then I began to see at it as a thing of beauty. There it is... The very first version of the tool I would use throughout the second half of my career.

A "digital" camera...

No film, no film batch matching, no film processing, no more processing errors, no Polaroid test prints, with smelly corrosive chemicals, no waste, no trips to the processing lab, fewer parking tickets, whilst waiting for film, no "once only" decisions about pushing and pulling the film, no clip tests and lost frames, no marking up film pods, no arguments with airport security staff about putting the film through the X-Ray machines, no fogged edges, no half moons or cockling, no scratches, no white gloves, no chinagraphs and traces, no sleeves, no moisture free storage... Nivarna's precursor.

It takes vision and dedication to produce a piece of digital kit that stands alone in an analogue world, and further, to postulate what may happen in the future...

Context is everything. Think about the world, at that time, in which Steve lived.

1975

  • No public internet
  • No personal computers
  • No desktop publishing
  • No digital storage

...in spite of all this. here it is...

Steven Sasson-with-camera

Steven Sasson with his "hand held" digital camera

How did it work?

Using the exposure button, you took the picture, captured by a CCD, and the camera, wrote the information to the RAM, you then off loaded the image to a cassette tape. In principle, this is exactly the same as it is achieved today by my Sony A7R Mk3 mirrorless camera. The difference is that the SONY has a very large and speedy buffer and fast SD cards on which to offload the images. So, Steve's camera used exactly the same principles as every compact, DSLR and mirrorless camera today.

What are the specs?

  • 100x100 Pixel CCD Black & White Sensor
  • 0.01mp Resolution
  • 30 image capacity, on a single cassette tape drive
  • 23 second "write to tape" time
  • 3.6Kg in weight
  • The camera was a prototype.
  • It was made up of parts of Kodak’s Super 8 movie camera
  • The circuit boards were custom, and it used a CCD sensor (Charged Coupled Device) that shot black & white
  • Captured Images were transferred from the sensor to the camera’s RAM in about 50ms.

Referring to the issue of resolution, In meetings at Kodak, Steven said that he thought people would reasonably expect around 2 megapixels to be satisfied with the quality. That seems small now however, back then that was a vast number!

 

So what does a 100x100 black & white image look like?

It looks like this. Here's me at 100 x 100 pixels, in black & white

100x100-pixel-image

100x100 pixel image

OK, now we have the image file captured, all we need now is a playback system and a screen on which to view it...

Prototype-Digital-Camera-Playback-System

and here it is... from tape to computer to television

and here it is... from tape to computer to television. It may have looked like that in 1975 but it looks like this in 2019...

2019-Digital-Capture

It may have looked like that in 1975 but it looks like this in 2019...

How does the 100x100 pixel image compare with an image from my SONY A7R Mk3?

Here's a 100x100 pixel image of Cody:

Cody-100x100 pixels

This is the image size that the Kodak camera shot. Very nice, but quite small.
Note: in reality this image is a scaled down file, taken from the SONY original file.
Number of pixels: 10,000

Here's the same 100 x 100 pixel portion of the same image taken from the original file that the SONY A7R Mk3 produces:

Cody-eye-close-up

In case you can't see it, this is the centre of Cody's eye. (same image, same file)
Number of pixels: 10,000

To make things clearer, and as a visual aid only, here's a same file as the image above that shows 1000x1000 pixels. That's a hundred times more resolution (same image, same file)

Cody-100000-pixels

Number of pixels: 1,000,000

And finally below, here's the full file of the SONY shot...

The original file is 5304x7592 pixels, when used at full resolution (it's slightly cropped!). What you see here is 583x785 pixels, Your screen would need to be larger than your desk and maybe your shelves, to see it all!

Number of pixels in the original: 40,267,968 (That's over forty million pixels! Same image, same file). And of course this image is in colour (RGB)

Cody shot on Sony A7R3

We can't have a SONY A7R Mk3 image (or Mk4 come to that) without Steven Sasson inventing the Kodak Digital Camera.

It was not until 1991 when we saw the Kodak DCS 100 as the first digital camera available to buy.

Just look at that storage device!

Kodak-DCS-100 Camera

based on a Nikon F3. The Kodak DCS100, the first commercially available Digital Camera

So, now we have the camera... thanks, Steven.

What else is needed, so we can use it on a daily basis?

  • We need to perfect the desktop computer (Circa 1977)
three computers Byte magazine referred to as the "1977 Trinity."

1977. The three computers Byte magazine referred to as the "1977 Trinity." From left to right: The Commodore PET 2001, the Apple II, and the TRS-80 Model 1.

1980-Small-HDD from Seagate

Seagate's ST-506, with a 5Mb capacity. It is the daddy and a bad boy all rolled in to one.

  • Formalise the image file formats so that we could exchange images (Circa 1974-1992 - Nasir Ahmed, T. Natarajan, and K. R. Rao)
  • Invent the mobile telephone with cameras (Circa 2002 - Nokia 7650 & Sanyo SPC-5300)
  • Invent social media (Facebook 2004, Twitter 2006, Instagram 2010) - other social media services are available 🙂

...all that history so that I can produce this:

Colin-Anthony-Thumbs-Up

Idiot boy gives the thumbs up to Steven Sasson

But that's the point really isn't it?

This technology allows us to share more. It liberates us to share as we like, when we like, and what we like.
One person's silly thumbs up is another person's "Kodak Moment"

So today, let's celebrate Steven Sasson and Eastman Kodak, for the digital camera that produced images like this...

100x100-pixel-image

...that has led to technology that allows me to take pictures like this:

from a Canon G9 Compact Camera:

Koln-Dom-Cologne

Koln Dom during the golden hour

and this from a SONY A7R Mk3 Mirrorless Camera...

Shimmering Sea - Mustique

View from Firefly Mustique.

and this from a Hasslblad 503cw with CFV39 Digital Back...

Romy-Man-Ray

Romany - After Man Ray

Further information

If you'd like to hear what Steven has to say about his time at Kodak this video says it all:

Article Categories

Article Archives

Affiliate Adverts

Loading

2 Comments

  1. Nick Lawrence

    Nice Article Colin. A good follow up to this may be an article about the evolution of the Kodak digital cameras with Frankenstein Nikon based models up to their season DCS Pro full frame model.

    Reply
    • Colin Anthony

      Thanks Nick.

      It’s astounding that Kodak had such a lead and the wherewith all to lead the charge into digital photography. It seems to me that the world of photography seems somehow bereft without the big yellow giant clashing with the little green pretender.
      I have another article coming up in a few weeks regarding this very subject. I think they simply didn’t want to kill their own Market(s)
      Re: The DCS range there’s a great article you can download at:

      http://www.nikonweb.com/files/DCS_Story.pdf

      Camera kit porn for geeks like… well, like you and me Nick 😉

      Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 1 MB. You can upload: image, video, document, interactive, text, archive. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here

AFFILIATE ADVERTISEMENTS

As an affiliate of many brands and services, including Amazon, I often get early notifications of special offers and I post these on the ads & offers panel.
I put the offers here as it means that more people will see them, as I write articles and reviews regularly and this panel appears on every article.
This ad panel is dynamic and will display current ads & offers from around the world. You should see ads from your territory. I hope some of you find the links useful and save some money.

declaration: site displays ads – they may appear on any page as text and banners. as an amazon associate I may earn from qualifying purchases. more info